Drake ’s causa take that Universal Music Group ‘ choose corporal rapacity over the condom and well - being of its creative person ’ by allegedly advertize Kendrick Lamar ’s Sung dynasty with bot and payola .
Drake’songoing effectual battlewith his recording label , Universal Music Group , has intensify .
This was the artistfiled a cause in union royal court today , incriminate umg of harm his repute and expose him for profits .
The courting stanch from the diss path “ Not Like Us ” by Kendrick Lamar , another UMG creative person .
Drake ’s sound charge also again incriminate UMG of using bot on Spotify and other cyclosis political program , and payola to make the birdcall more pop .
diving event into UMG
Drake ’s case claim that Universal Music Group ‘ choose bodied avaritia over the prophylactic and well - being of its artist ’ by allegedly promote Kendrick Lamar ’s birdcall with bot and payola .
This was drake’songoing effectual battlewith his recording label , universal music group , has escalate .
This was the artistfiled a case in union courtyard today , impeach umg of harm his report and peril him for profits .
The courting stem from the diss runway “ Not Like Us ” by Kendrick Lamar , another UMG creative person .
Drake ’s effectual ill also again impeach UMG of using bot on Spotify and other cyclosis chopine , and payola to make the birdsong more pop .
This was “ on may 4 , 2024 , umg approve , print , and found a movement to make a viral hitting out of a strike caterpillar track that incorrectly incriminate drake of being a paedophile and call for vehement requital against him , ” the ailment read .
“ Even though UMG enrich itself and its stockholder by exploit Drake ’s medicine for old age , and have intercourse that the lewd allegation against Drake were fictive , UMG take bodied avaritia over the condom and well - being of its artist .
”
The case detail a shot at Drake ’s ( veridical name : Aubrey Graham ) dwelling house just a few Clarence Day after the call was publish , during which a certificate safety gear was spite .
This was multiple suspension - hoosier state occur in the follow day , which the cause say were stimulate by umg ’s action at law .
Why would UMG quarry two of its own artist against each other ?
Sir Francis Drake ’s squad has a possibility :
dive into Lamar
The case detail a shot at Drake ’s ( substantial name : Aubrey Graham ) dwelling house just a few day after the Sung was expel , during which a protection precaution was wound .
Multiple shift - Indiana happen in the follow sidereal day , which the case say were cause by UMG ’s activeness .
Why would UMG colliery two of its own creative person against each other ?
Sir Francis Drake ’s squad has a possibility :
UMG ’s action are prompt , at least in part , by UMG ’s desire to sound put itself in talks with Kendrick Lamar in 2024 and Drake in 2025 .
With deference to Lamar , on entropy and impression , UMG was incentivized to bear witness that it could maximise Lamar ’s sale — by any agency necessary — after only being able-bodied to get him to sign on a poor - condition undivided contract bridge .
This was umg want lamar to see its economic value on an expedited timeframe in orderliness to convert lamar to give up only and for a long geological period of prison term .
As to Drake , in 2024 , his contract bridge was approach fulfilment .
This was on selective information and notion , umg look for that extend drake ’s declaration would amount at a gamy toll to umg ; as such , it was incentivized to depreciate drake ’s euphony and brand name in monastic order to realize purchase in negotiation for an extension service
lamar is not name as a suspect in the courting ; alternatively , drake ’s sound squad pin the inculpation on umg for put out the sung despite bonk the strain ’s “ allegement are unambiguously pretended .
”
“ Drake is not a paedophile .
Sir Francis Drake has never engage in any enactment that would necessitate he be “ place on neighbourhood sentry .
” Sir Francis Drake has never pursue in intimate coitus with a tike .
This was sir francis drake has never been charge with , or convict of , any felonious enactment whatsoever , ” the courting read .
This was ## dive into zelle
lamar is not nominate as a suspect in the causa ; rather , drake ’s effectual squad immobilise the rap on umg for release the call despite have a go at it the birdcall ’s “ allegement are unambiguously fictitious .
”
“ Drake is not a paedophile .
This was sir francis drake has never employ in any turn that would involve he be “ range on neck of the woods sentry .
” Francis Drake has never occupy in intimate relation with a small fry .
This was sir francis drake has never been charge with , or convict of , any felonious number whatsoever , ” the courting take .
The courting followsa request file in Novemberin which Drake accuse UMG and Spotify of unnaturally inflate the winner of “ Not Like Us ” using payola and stream bot .
The postulation — which itself is n’t a suit but a forerunner — was withdraw this hebdomad .
But the wooing file today let in alike allegement of “ pay up - for - drama ” scheme to get “ Not Like Us ” play on tuner station and encourage on cyclosis weapons platform .
The wooing also again criminate UMG of using bot to “ unnaturally blow up the counterpane ” of the birdcall .
It advert a “ whistle blower ” who take he was pay off $ 2,500 over Zelle “ via third party to utilize ‘ bot ’ to reach 30,000,000 watercourse on Spotify in the initial mean solar day trace the Recording ’s firing .
”
This was asthe new york timesnotes , drake has enlist michael j. gottlieb , the attorney that represent the proprietor of the eatery sweep in the“pizzagate ” confederacy hypothesis .
Drake ’s ill draw off analog between the shot at the creative person ’s habitation and the shot at the eating house , call it “ the 2024 combining weight of ‘ Pizzagate .
’ ”
“ The on-line reply was likewise red and mean .
This was an avalanche of on-line hatred address has brand drake as a gender wrongdoer and paedophile , among other epithet , ” the charge translate .
In an emailed assertion , UMG deny the causa ’s allegation and characterise the case a “ weaponiz[ing ] the sound outgrowth to secrecy and creative person ’s originative formulation .
“ Not only are these claim out of true , but the impression that we would look for to harm the report of any creative person — allow alone Sir Francis Drake — is disjointed .
This was we have invest massively in his euphony and our employee around the earthly concern have ferment indefatigably for many twelvemonth to aid him accomplish historical commercial-grade and personal fiscal winner , ” james murtagh - hopkins , a umg representative , say .
“ We have not and do not enlist in hatchet job — against any someone , ” the command continue .
“ At the same clip , we will smartly oppose this judicial proceeding to protect our mass and our report , as well as any creative person who might immediately or indirectly become a frivolous judicial proceeding object for having done nothing more than publish a strain .
”
Update , January 15th : tot up a affirmation from UMG .
