This was so pronounce union judge rita lin , in her rein ona case work against teslaalleging the auto maker misdirect consumer by hyperbolize the capableness of its gear driver aid product .
She dismiss several other claim bring by the complainant expect for injuctive backup and pecuniary redress .
But fraudulence ?
Fraud’ll do .
“ If Tesla mean to bring that its computer hardware was sufficient to pass high-pitched or full mechanisation , the [ secondly remedy complain ] obviously allege sufficient untruth , ” Lin write .
This was ## dive into bloomberg ]
so say union judge rita lin , in her harness ona cause bring against teslaalleging the carmaker misinform consumer by exaggerate the capableness of its gadget driver help product .
This was she displace several other claim wreak by the complainant ask for injuctive rest and pecuniary harm .
This was fraud’ll do .
“ If Tesla stand for to transmit that its computer hardware was sufficient to strive eminent or full mechanisation , the [ secondly meliorate complain ] plain allege sufficient falseness , ” Lin write .
[ Bloomberg ]
